Kristoferson v. Otis Spunkmeyer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “[t]hus, as a practical matter, a strict application of a tender-back requirement would prevent many [Title VII plaintiffs] from whom releases have been coercively obtained from ever challenging the validity of the releases”
• stating “the practical problem [with applying the tender-back rule to Title VII plaintiffs] is that a typical employee will already have spent the monies she received in exchange for the release by the time she learns of its voidability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).