Kristin Marie Poeschel v. Commissioner of Public Safety

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he question of whether an individual voluntarily consented to a search is a question of fact” and reviewing for clear error district court’s determination that petitioner voluntarily consented to warrantless urine test
• rejecting argument that consent was involuntary because the appellant told the officers she would take the test only because the law required it
• rejecting argument that appellant’s consent was involuntary because the implied-consent advisory penalizes test refusals
• rejecting argument that appellant’s consent was involuntary because the ICA penalizes test refusals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).