Kristie Bell v. Cheswick Generating Station Ge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “once a SIP is approved, its requirements become federal law and are fully enforceable in federal court” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• holding that there 5 is “no meaningful distinction between the [savings clauses found in the] Clean 6 Water Act and the Clean Air Act”
• noting that approved SIPs are federal law and may be enforced in federal court under CAA citizen suit provision
• allowing private property owners’ claims for nuisance, negligence, and trespass based on facility’s flying ash and unburned by-products to go forward
• describing the similarities between the CWA and CAA and applying Ouellette 's holding in the CAA context
• finding \no meaningful difference between the [CWA] and the [CAA] for the purposes of [a] preemption analysis\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).