Skip to main content
· 9/21/2005

Krista Jackson v. Cintas Corporation

Citations

  • 425 F.3d 1313
  • 10 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1546
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20199
  • 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,117
  • 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 825
  • 2005 WL 2292153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “every circuit that has considered this issue has held that the pendency of a motion for sanctions after a dismissal on the merits does not bar appellate jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Hull, Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.