· 9/21/2005
Krista Jackson v. Cintas Corporation
Citations
- 425 F.3d 1313
- 10 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1546
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20199
- 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,117
- 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 825
- 2005 WL 2292153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “every circuit that has considered this issue has held that the pendency of a motion for sanctions after a dismissal on the merits does not bar appellate jurisdiction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Birch, Hull, Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.