Krist v. Kolombos Rest. Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in a bench trial, “[i]t is within the province of the district court as the trier of fact to decide whose testimony should be credited[.]”
• explaining that, in a bench trial, “[i]t is within the province of the district court as the trier of fact to decide whose testimony should be credited”
• affirming that intent is not a required element for a claim under Title III of the ADA but can be relevant to a claim for punitive damages under the NYCHRL
• reviewing bench trial decision which considered whether plaintiff had established an ADA claim “by a preponderance of the evidence”
• rejecting contention that Title III of the ADA imposes a civility code
• acknowledging “[t]he State-law claim [NYSCHRL] is coextensive” with the ADA claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).