Krinsky v. Doe 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \the Dendrite test ... require[s] too much\
• finding that in the context of an online 6 message board containing “vulgar and insulting” language, a statement that the plaintiff had a “fake 7 medical degree” was obviously intended as ridicule rather than a statement of fact
• distinguishing the Dendrite prima facie test from the Cahill summary judgment test
• distinguishing the Dendrite prima facie test from the Cahill summary judgment test
• adopting a test that “closely resembles the ‘summary judgment’ standard articulated in Cahill”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).