Skip to main content
· 9/14/1999

Krim v. ProNet, Inc.

Citations

  • 744 A.2d 523
  • 1999 Del. Ch. LEXIS 191
  • 1999 WL 787868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • involving breach of corporate directors’ duty to disclose certain information when seeking stockholder action
  • “[T]hat several directors would retain board membership in the merged entity does not, standing alone, create a conflict of interest.”
  • “[T]he fact that several directors would retain board membership in the merged entity does not, standing alone, create a conflict of interest.”
  • “[T]he fact that several directors would retain board membership in the merged entity does not, standing alone, create a conflict of interest.”
  • “The vesting of options does not create a conflict as a high exchange ratio for ProNet shares benefits the option-holding directors as much as, if not more than, the regular stockholders.”
  • “The vesting of options does not create a conflict as a high exchange ratio for ProNet shares benefits the option-holding directors as much as, if not more than, the regular stockholders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.