Krim v. Osborne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal was not an abuse of discretion where the plaintiff failed to comply with discovery requests and orders over a period two years
• holding that dismissal was not an abuse of discretion where the plaintiff failed to comply with discovery requests and orders over a period two years
• To be “wilful” the failure need not be accompanied by wrongful intent; it is sufficient if it is conscious or intentional, not accidental or involuntary.
• dismissal with prejudice was justified, following motion to dismiss, where there had been repeated dilatory conduct and plaintiff had failed to comply with directive to make more certain answers to interrogatories and to produce documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).