Krihely v. Mayorkas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Confrontation Clause requires that a hearsay exception be firmly rooted and reliable
• holding that competing interests, if closely examined, may justify dispensing with face-to-face confrontation at trial
• holding that, under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, an unavailable declarant's \statement is admissible only if it bears adequate `indicia of reliability.'\
• holding that, under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, an unavailable declarant’s “statement is admissible only if it bears adequate ‘indicia of reliability.’ ”
• holding that competing interests, if closely examined, may justify dispensing with face-to-face confrontation at trial
• holding that hearsay evidence does not violate the confrontation clause if declarant is unavailable and it “bears adequate ‘indicia of reliability”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).