Krieser Ex Rel. Krieser v. Hobbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts in sixteen states have deemed full offsets to be incompatible with several liability regimes
• noting that courts in sixteen states have deemed full offsets to be incompatible with several liability regimes
• indicating that postjudgment interest runs from the date of the judgment in which the damages were assessed, not from the date of a modified judgment
• stating federal courts exercising diversity jurisdiction apply the law of the forum state
• “ ‘one-satisfaction’ rule exist[s] to prevent the plaintiff from recovering twice from the same assessment of liability”
• “It goes without saying that, for a diversity action, we apply state substantive law[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).