Krieger v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unreasonable to withhold consent because landlord would lose proposed subtenant as tenant in another building
• 4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned
• 4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
• 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-12-20· cited 148×
• Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1985-12-05· cited 104×
• Ringwood Assocs., Ltd. v. Jack's of Route 23, Inc.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-09-15· cited 34×
• Economy Rentals, Inc. v. Garcia
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-09-24· cited 25×
• Reilly v. Riviera Towers Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-03-27· cited 8×
• Popovic v. FLA MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-05-17· cited 5×
• Questech, Inc. v. 7600 Ltd. Partnership
  Fairfax County Circuit Court· 1994-09-22· cited 1×

Other cases named Krieger v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Krieger v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1973-04-02