Skip to main content
· 11/25/2009

Kress v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP

Citations

  • 263 F.R.D. 623
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117949
  • 2009 WL 4269465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff’s argument that she would be harmed in her “reputation and finances” if it was revealed that she was arrested for public intoxication did not outweigh the presumption of access
  • plaintiff’s argument that she would be harmed in her “reputation and finances” if it was revealed that she was arrested for public intoxication did not outweigh the presumption of access
  • plaintiff’s argument that she would be harmed in her “reputation and finances” if it was revealed that she was arrested for public intoxication did not outweigh the presumption of access
  • plaintiff’s argument that she would be harmed in her “reputation and finances” if it was revealed that she was arrested for public intoxication did not outweigh the presumption of access
  • allowing a plaintiff to proceed under a pseudonym before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karlton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.