Krepps v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a conviction for stalking requires the state to prove, as part of establishing the element of “harassing and intimidating” behavior, a pattern or a course of conduct
• “Notwithstanding a defendant’s claims of innocent motives, it is for the finder of fact to determine whether the defendant acted with the requisite degree of criminal intent in engaging in the act for which he is prosecuted.”
• although defendant did not threaten victim, phone calls caused defendant “quite a bit of concern” about his safety
• evidence sufficient to support stalking conviction where defendant repeatedly called victim without the victim’s consent for the purpose of harassing and intimidating him
• evidence sufficient to support stalking conviction where defendant repeatedly called victim without the victim’s consent for the purpose of harassing and intimidating him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).