Skip to main content
· 1/6/1896

Krepps v. Miller

Citations

  • 172 Pa. 393
  • 34 A. 51
  • 1896 Pa. LEXIS 788

Syllabus

<p>Sheriff's interpleader — Sale—Change of possession — •Evidence.</p> <p>The Supreme Court will not reverse a judgment in favor of an execution creditor in a sheriff’s interpleader, where it appears that the property in dispute was the furniture and fittings of a restaurant; that the defendant in the execution, being indebted to the claimant, executed to him a bill of sale of the goods before execution issued; that the claimant then took a lease from the landlord of the restaurant premises in his own name, and rented the furniture and fixtures to the defendant in the execution ; and that the sign of the defendant in the execution remained over the front entrance after the sale without change.</p>

Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.