Skip to main content
· 10/24/1996

Krennerich v. Inhabitants of the Town of Bristol

Citations

  • 943 F. Supp. 1345
  • 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1195
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16730
  • 1996 WL 650920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that ADA does not require employers \'to assign existing employees or hire new employees'\ to perform abandoned \essential functions\ of plaintiff's job position
  • noting that ADA does not require employers \'to assign existing employees or hire new employees'\ to perform abandoned \essential functions\ of plaintiff's job position
  • stating that an employee has no property interest in at-will employment
  • finding plaintiff had presented evidence sufficient to suggest a reasonable expectation of continued employment
  • finding, in case of plaintiff who alleged termination without due process, a genuine issue of material fact as to whether plaintiff resigned or was terminated and therefore whether he had been “deprived” of acknowledged property interest in his position
  • “In Maine a property interest in continued employment may be established by contract, statute, or by proof of an objectively reasonable expectation of continued employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gene Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.