Skip to main content
· 1/12/1973

Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.

Citations

  • 203 N.W.2d 841
  • 295 Minn. 200
  • 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although the question of whether a joint venture existed should have been submitted to the jury, undisputed facts permitted a finding of a joint venture as a matter of law
  • setting forth the exception and a test for determining a joint enterprise
  • “In a joint adventure, the individual defendants are jointly liable as a unit because of their mutual undertaking for a common purpose and their right of direction and control over the enterprise, even though there is no actual physical control or such control was never exercised.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.