· 12/20/2010
Krempasky v. Nez Perce County Planning & Zoning
Citations
- 245 P.3d 983
- 150 Idaho 231
- 2010 Ida. LEXIS 221
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding a conditional-use permit because the petitioner failed to challenge the district court's adverse ruling regarding substantial rights
- upholding a conditional-use permit because the petitioner failed to challenge the district court’s adverse ruling regarding substantial rights
- “[i]t is well established that in order for an issue to be raised on appeal, the record must reveal an adverse ruling which forms the basis for an assignment of error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.