Skip to main content
· 12/20/2010

Krempasky v. Nez Perce County Planning & Zoning

Citations

  • 245 P.3d 983
  • 150 Idaho 231
  • 2010 Ida. LEXIS 221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a conditional-use permit because the petitioner failed to challenge the district court's adverse ruling regarding substantial rights
  • upholding a conditional-use permit because the petitioner failed to challenge the district court’s adverse ruling regarding substantial rights
  • “[i]t is well established that in order for an issue to be raised on appeal, the record must reveal an adverse ruling which forms the basis for an assignment of error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.