KREMBEL, KEVYN MICHAEL, PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[t]he City’s nondiscrimination policy is a neutral, generally applicable law, and the religious views of CSS do not entitle it to an exemption from that policy.”
• explaining that under Smith, “[t]he Free Exercise Clause does not, however, relieve an individual of the obligation to comply with a valid and neutral law of general applicability”
• “When evaluating a motion for preliminary injunctive relief, a court considers four factors: (1) has the moving party established a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits (which need not be more likely than not); (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).