Kreisers Inc. v. First Dakota Title Ltd. Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that company owed independent duty of care to ascertain what type of like-kind property exchange client wanted where company advertised that it performed exchanges without limitation but did not actually perform the type of complex exchange the client desired
• “First Dakota owed a duty of care to Kreisers beyond the contract between the two parties ... because an independent duty to exercise reasonable care arose from extraneous circumstances not constituting the elements of the contract.”
• “First Dakota owed a duty of care to Kreisers beyond the contract between the two parties . . . because an independent duty to exercise reasonable care arose from extraneous circumstances not constituting the elements of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).