Krein v. Nordstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• arguing lower courts misinterpret Jacoby-Bender to apply to transfer necessary for “confirmation” of a plan rather than “consummation” of a plan
• disapproving the practice of “extending] the Second Circuit’s language and altering] Jacoby-Bender’s holding, changing the test from ‘necessary to the consummation of a plan,’ to ‘necessary to the confirmation of a plan’”
• disapproving the practice of “extend[ing] the Second Circuit’s language and altering] Jacoby-Bender’ & holding, changing the test from ‘necessary to the consummation of a plan,’ to ‘necessary to the confirmation of a plan’”
• disapproving the practice of “extend[ing] the Second Circuit’s language and alter[ing] Jacoby-Bender’s holding, changing the test from ‘necessary to the consummation of a plan,’ to ‘necessary to the confirmation of a plan’ ”
• “This case is indeed one in which adjudication depends on the court’s jurisdiction over the state”
• jurisdiction over the dischargeability of debt and confirmation of a plan of reorganization derives from jurisdiction over debtors and their estates, not from jurisdiction over the state or other creditors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).