Kreielsheimer v. Gill
Citations
- 85 Wash. 175
- 147 P. 871
- 1915 Wash. LEXIS 1264
Syllabus
<p>Limitation op Actions — Construction—Estoppel. Debtors primarily liable on an account, which they induced the creditor to assign to their agent for collection for the purpose of suing one secondarily liable thereon for the benefit of the creditor as well as themselves, are estopped to invoke the statute of limitations in an action against them by the creditor, where the original debtors had promised to pay as soon as suit against the secondary debtors was over regardless of the outcome, and thereby induced the creditor to delay enforcement of his claim, and thus wrongfully obtained an advantage which equity will not allow them to hold; especially where the suit against the party secondarily liable was undetermined and not subject to the plea of the statute.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant promised to pay debt after termination of suit against person secondarily liable
- defendant promised to pay debt after termination of suit against person secondarily liable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chadwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peterson v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-22· cited 46×
- Marcum v. Richmond Auto Parts Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1971-06-29· cited 24×
- Marshall-Wells Hardware Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1916-01-28· cited 10×
- Grismer v. Merger Mines CorporationE.D. Washington· 1942-03-21· cited 6×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.