Skip to main content
· 3/1/2007

KREDITVEREIN DER BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT FUR NIEDERÖSTERREICH UND BERGENLAND BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT AG v. CHRISTA NEJEZCHLEBA

Citations

  • 477 F.3d 942
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 4652
  • 2007 WL 609916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a stay would not effectively end the litigation because the outcome of the related litigation would \affect only a small portion of the district court proceedings\
  • noting distinction between stay due to Colorado River abstention and stay under court's inherent power
  • recognizing a district court’s inherent power to stay an action
  • “The only time that an order granting a stay will be considered a final order is if [the stay] is tantamount to a dismissal and [the stay] effectively ends the litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Melloy, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.