· 3/1/2007
KREDITVEREIN DER BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT FUR NIEDERÖSTERREICH UND BERGENLAND BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT AG v. CHRISTA NEJEZCHLEBA
Citations
- 477 F.3d 942
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 4652
- 2007 WL 609916
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a stay would not effectively end the litigation because the outcome of the related litigation would \affect only a small portion of the district court proceedings\
- noting distinction between stay due to Colorado River abstention and stay under court's inherent power
- recognizing a district court’s inherent power to stay an action
- “The only time that an order granting a stay will be considered a final order is if [the stay] is tantamount to a dismissal and [the stay] effectively ends the litigation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Melloy, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.