Krebs v. Rosenstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that any error arising from the jury’s presence during the preliminary examination was harmless because “the admissions were in fact free and voluntary, and were therefore properly receivable in evidence,” but ultimately reversing conviction due to insufficient evidence
• “[b]ut grant[ing] that the same rule holds with respect to criminating admissions as with respect to confessions of guilt . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).