Krawtchuk v. Banco Do Brasil, S. A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress where letter characterized plaintiffs actions as a “crime of theft” and a “crime of extortion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Silberstein v. Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1997-12-23· cited 10×
• Coliniatis v. Dimas
  S.D. New York· 1994-03-31· cited 9×
• Cunningham v. Mertz
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-10-12· cited 3×
• Offor v. Mercy Med. Ctr.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2019-04-09

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1983-03-29· cited 1,284×