Skip to main content
· 2/15/1978

Kravitz v. Pressman, Frohlich & Frost, Inc.

Citations

  • 447 F. Supp. 203
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff not estopped from claiming ignorance with respect to churning where she became close Mends with her broker, dated him on a regular basis, and came to rely on him for advice on a wide variety of matters
  • upholding claims under Rule 10b-5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.