· 2/15/1978
Kravitz v. Pressman, Frohlich & Frost, Inc.
Citations
- 447 F. Supp. 203
- 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19551
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff not estopped from claiming ignorance with respect to churning where she became close Mends with her broker, dated him on a regular basis, and came to rely on him for advice on a wide variety of matters
- upholding claims under Rule 10b-5
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.