Skip to main content
· 1/30/2003

Krauss v. Catholic Health Initiatives Mountain Region

Citations

  • 66 P.3d 195
  • 2003 Colo. App. LEXIS 124
  • 2003 WL 193732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that discharge is wrongful when it “contravenes a clear mandate of public policy”
  • affirming grant of summary judgment to employer after assuming, without deciding, that employee established all elements of prima facie retaliation claim and addressing only whether employee raised factual issue to counter employer’s non-retaliatory explanation
  • referring to “the resignation element of a constructive discharge claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webb, Davidson, Roy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.