Kraus v. Kraus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that either party should be able to rely upon the court's order for the time period covered by the temporary order, and the trial court should only be required once to use its resources to decide the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ghay v. Ghay
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-13· cited 24×
• Dent v. Dent
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 12×
• Murphy v. Murphy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-02· cited 10×
• Israel v. Israel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-31· cited 6×
• Rodgers v. Diederichsen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-13· cited 3×
• Flores v. Flores
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-19· cited 3×
• Sikora v. Sikora
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-10· cited 3×
• Gillman v. Locke
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-28
• Bush v. Bush
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-05

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Warner v. Warner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-25· cited 42×
• Brickell v. Graves Investment Company
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1942-05-19· cited 4×
• James v. James
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1956-01-04· cited 3×