Skip to main content
· 6/10/1922

Kratz v. Padfield

Citations

  • 111 Kan. 396
  • 207 P. 776
  • 1922 Kan. LEXIS 258

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Reformation of Contract — Insufficient Evidence. Refusal of the district court to reform a written instrument because the evidence failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the instrument did not express the intention of the parties, approved.</p>

Judges: Burch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.