Skip to main content
· 1/7/2010

Krasner v. HSH NORDBANK AG

Citations

  • 680 F. Supp. 2d 502
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1305
  • 108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 531
  • 2010 WL 86845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a hostile work environment “is [not] something that exists in some absolute way, like poisonous chemicals in the air, affecting everyone who comes in contact with it”
  • dismissing hostile work environment claims where plaintiff failed to demonstrate that “he was singled out for mistreatment because of [his] sex”
  • declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over NYSHRL and NYCHRL following dismissal of Title VII claims
  • explaining an “unpleasant” or “nasty” environment is not necessarily a “hostile” one
  • “Title VII does not prohibit employers from maintaining nasty, unpleasant workplaces . . . [r]ather, it prohibits employers from discriminating against an employee (including by subjecting him or her to hostile working conditions
  • “Title VII does not prohibit employers from maintaining nasty, unpleasant workplaces.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gerard E. Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.