Krasaeath v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the medical malpractice statute of repose, which stated that the five-year statute of limitation was intended to create a five-year statute of ultimate repose and abrogation, barred the filing of a contribution claim
• statute of repose barred contribution claim even though suit was timely under the twenty-year statute of limitations governing contribution actions
• statute of repose barred contribution claim even though suit was timely under the twenty-year statute of limitations governing contribution actions
• even if action for contribution against radiologist was not barred by the 20-year statute of limitation, it was barred by the 5-year statute of repose
• “The 20-year statute of limitation for contribution actions is governed by OCGA § 9-3-22.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).