Skip to main content
· 5/17/1989

Kramersmeier v. R.G. Dickinson & Co.

Citations

  • 440 N.W.2d 873
  • 1989 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 147
  • 1989 WL 52267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] preliminary inquiry into the legal and factual sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ claim is appropriate inasmuch as they seek to represent the interests of the entire class.”
  • “[A] reversal of the trial court’s certification order for failure of proof of reliance would be tantamount to requiring proof of plaintiffs’ ability to ‘win on the merits,’ a showing clearly not contemplated by [the rules] or prior decisions of this court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Larson, Carter, Neuman, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.