Skip to main content
· 1/3/1893

Kramer v. Winslow

Citations

  • 154 Pa. 637
  • 25 A. 766
  • 1893 Pa. LEXIS 946

Syllabus

<p>Practice — Supreme Court — Assignment of error to admission oj evidence.</p> <p>An assignment of error to the admission of evidence, which does not set forth the evidence admitted under the objection, is improper, and will not be_ considered by the Supreme Court.</p> <p>Principal and agent — Purchase money of real estate.</p> <p>In an action by a principal to recover a balance of purchase money claimed to have been retained by the agent in the sale of the principal’s real estate, where plaintiff asks the court to charge that defendant could not make any profit out of the sale, it is not improper to affirm the point with the qualification that if the jury should find the further fact, that the interest or profit claimed by defendant was acquired by him after making known all material facts to, and by the consent of, plaintiff, prior to the sale, they should disregard the point.</p>

Judges: Heydrick, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.