Skip to main content
· 2/25/2014

Kramer v. Wasatch County Sheriff's Office

Citations

  • 743 F.3d 726
  • 2014 WL 702111
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3468
  • 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,022
  • 121 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ellipsis and internal quotation marks 8 Appellate Case: 23-6091 Document: 010111034901 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 9 omitted
  • Sheriff's notice of accusations about being a thief didn't provide plaintiff's employer notice of unreported sexual harassment
  • “A manager who works closely with his or her subordinates and who has the power to recommend or otherwise substantially influence tangible employment actions, and who can thus indirectly effectuate them, also qualifies as a ‘supervisor’ under Title VII.”
  • finding denial of leave was not a tangible employment action
  • “In contrast to a coworker who can only cause a demotion or a pay cut through some elaborate scheme, a supervisor who lacks the direct power to impose tangible employment consequences can accomplish the same easily, without scheming . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Seymour, Bacharach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.