Skip to main content
· 2/6/1992

Kramer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance

Citations

  • 603 A.2d 192
  • 412 Pa. Super. 227
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding insurer’s assertions regarding its refusal to pay under insurance policy was not fraudulent communication or form of duress which forced insured to forbear bringing suit
  • holding insurer’s assertions regarding its refusal to pay under insurance policy was not fraudulent communication or form of duress which forced insured to forbear bringing suit
  • following this holding, but noting that common-law actions for fraud and deceit would still be available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Johnson, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.