· 2/6/1992
Kramer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance
Citations
- 603 A.2d 192
- 412 Pa. Super. 227
- 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding insurer’s assertions regarding its refusal to pay under insurance policy was not fraudulent communication or form of duress which forced insured to forbear bringing suit
- holding insurer’s assertions regarding its refusal to pay under insurance policy was not fraudulent communication or form of duress which forced insured to forbear bringing suit
- following this holding, but noting that common-law actions for fraud and deceit would still be available
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sole, Johnson, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.