Kramer v. Poland (In Re Poland)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an asset still has value to the bankruptcy estate and is not lost, even if the Debtor misstates the asset’s value
• “A debtor’s estimation [of a business] is often far from exact, and is more often than not, based on estimates, not tangible facts.”
• “A debtor’s estimation [of the value of property for purposes of the bankruptcy schedules] is often far from exact, and is more often than not, based on estimates, not tangible facts.”
• “it is well established that once the Plaintiff has met the initial burden by producing evidence which establishes a basis for the objection, the Defendant has the ultimate burden of persuasion. See, Chalik v. Moorefield (In re Chalik), 748 F.2d 616, 619 (11th Cir.1984).”
• “it is well established that once the Plaintiff has met the initial burden by producing evidence which establishes a basis for the objection, the Defendant has the ultimate burden of persuasion. See, Chalik v. Moorefield (In re Chalik), 748 F.2d 616, 619 (11th Cir.1984).”
• “it is well established that once the Plaintiff has met the initial burden by producing evidence which establishes a basis for the objection, the Defendant has the ultimate burden of persuasion. See, Chalik v. Moorefield (In re Chalik), 748 F.2d 616, 619 (11th Cir.1984).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).