Kramer v. J.I. Case Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling must be final and definitive to preserve right to review
• improper admission of surprise testimony is grounds for new trial only in circumstances illustrating that prejudice occurred
• “[A] blanket exclusion of evidence of events that occurred before or after the discrimination is arbitrary.”
• “A party aggrieved by a commissioner’s ruling can only object by a motion to modify filed no 19 Nos. 36886-6-III and 37777-6-III

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).