Skip to main content
· 6/18/1986

Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel v. Aronoff

Citations

  • 638 F. Supp. 714
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24023

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that C.P.L.R. 5001(a) applies to an action on an account stated
  • granting summary judgment where almost three years passed before a bill was questioned “such a period of silence — in which there was ample opportunity to object to the billing — amounts to an implied acquiescence to the stated account”
  • granting summary judgment where almost three years passed before a bill was questioned “such a period of silence — in which there was ample opportunity to object to the billing — amounts to an implied acquiescence to the stated account”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.