KRAMER ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Ikam, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “mutual assent[] is most clearly evidenced by the terms of a signed written agreement” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that “[t]he parties’ acts” can also indicate mutual assent
• returning $75,000 deposit under equitable doctrine of unjust enrichment after finding that the parties had failed to form a binding contractual agreement
• “[T]he part[y] asserting the existence of a contract . . . ha[s] the burden of proving that one existed.”
• requiring evidence of “mutual assent” to enforce a contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).