Skip to main content
· 9/30/1991

Krakow v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION

Citations

  • 586 So. 2d 1271
  • 1991 WL 193136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[o]nce the board failed to act in a timely manner, it was precluded from considering the merits of the appellants’ application and . . . the application must be deemed approved”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.