Krajewski v. Bourque

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding nexus existed sufficient to satisfy third part of rule when defendant’s ownership of motor vehicle involved in an investigated incident was the impetus for officer’s arrival on the premises, even though defendant did not summon officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).