Kraimer v. City of Schofield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ordinance is overbroad because it makes no exception for live performances with serious artistic, social, and political value or for exhibitions of film or art works
• holding that a similar ordinance, which regulated “establishments dealing in alcoholic beverages” applied to too broad a range of establishments, was not confined to “sexually oriented businesses,” and therefore was overbroad
• noting that a similar ordinance was not confined to sexually oriented business, but rather applied to “establishments dealing in alcoholic beverages”
• finding that a similar ordinance would “apply to a meeting of pediatricians at a conference room at a local motel, attending a presentation on recognizing the signs of sexual abuse and physical abuse of young children, so long as alcoholic beverages were being served in the motel’s bar”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).