Krahmer v. Christie's Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that tolling cannot be based on a communication that occurred after the statute of limitations had already expired
• finding actions that occurred after plaintiffs were on notice of their claims, even if fraudulent concealment, did not toll the statute of limitations
• granting summary judgment on fraud claim because of lack of evidence contradicting good faith belief in truth of statement
• granting summary judgment on fraud claim because of lack of evidence contradicting good faith belief in truth of statement
• the evidence must show that the defendant engaged in some sort of “actual artifice” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).