Kragt v. Board of Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the rights and duties of pro hac vice counsel, once admitted, are identical to those of a barred attorney
• counsel admitted pro hac vice in a capital case cannot be arbitrarily and capriciously removed without depriving their clients of their constitutional rights
• § 1983 Civil Rights action falls within the “expressly authorized by Congress” exception to § 2283
• Sec. 1983 Civil Rights action falls within the \expressly authorized by Congress\ exception to Sec. 2283
• “It has always been thought that the license to practice law is limited, except as a matter of grace, to persons who had fulfilled the local requirements for practice.”
• District court must retain jurisdiction of action by persons accused of capital crime to enjoin state judge from arbitrarily removing out-of-state lawyers, admitted as counsel for accused pro haec vie, pending use by an accused of relief available in state courts.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).