· 5/14/1889
Kraft-Holmes Grocery Co. v. Crow
Citations
- 36 Mo. App. 288
- 1889 Mo. App. LEXIS 272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- imposing a public reprimand where Respondent neglected legal matters in two cases and was in arrears on child support obligations
- “Respondent has neglected legal matters entrusted to him and has engaged in conduct which brings the legal profession into disrepute. His conduct has been prejudicial to the administration of justice and adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rombauer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.