Skip to main content
· 5/14/1889

Kraft-Holmes Grocery Co. v. Crow

Citations

  • 36 Mo. App. 288
  • 1889 Mo. App. LEXIS 272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • imposing a public reprimand where Respondent neglected legal matters in two cases and was in arrears on child support obligations
  • “Respondent has neglected legal matters entrusted to him and has engaged in conduct which brings the legal profession into disrepute. His conduct has been prejudicial to the administration of justice and adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rombauer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.