Kraft Foods North America, Inc. v. Banner Engineering & Sales, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “the plain meaning definition of indemnification does not limit reimbursement to losses suffered as a result of third party claims”
• “Instead, [plaintiff] has asked permission to prove its attorney’s fees if the Court should determine that it is entitled to them.” (emphasis added)
• “[T]he plain meaning definition of indemnification does not limit reimbursement to losses suffered as a result of third party claims.”
• “Virginia courts adhere to the ‘plain meaning’ rule of interpreting contracts, whereby the clear and explicit language in a contract is to be taken in its ordinary significance . . . .” (quoting IMWA Equities IX Co. v. WBC Assocs., 961 F.2d 780, 484 (4th Cir. 1992)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).