Kraemer v. Alvord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Salisbury’s memo could be used to impeach Ross’ assertion that he did not require plaintiff to remove the tar and slag materials
• “ ‘A PRP’s contribution liability will correspond to that party’s equitable share of the total liability and will not be joint and several’ ”
• “[W]e conclude that ‘release’ is broader than ‘disposal,’ because the definition of ‘release’ includes ‘disposing’ (also, it includes ‘passive’ terms such as ‘leaching’ and ‘escaping’ which are not included in the definition of ‘disposal’)”
• “[W]e can conclude that ‘release’ is broader than ‘disposal,’ because the definition of ‘release’ includes ‘disposing’ (also, it includes ‘passive’ terms such as ‘leaching’ and ‘escaping,’ which are not included in the definition of ‘disposal’).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).