· 7/24/2025

Kraczek v. Univ. of Cincinnati

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2607

Syllabus

The trial court was not required to consider excerpts from the witness's deposition transcript because it was not filed with the court or otherwise authenticated. In any event, nothing in the deposition excerpts would have changed the outcome of the motion for summary judgment. The trial court did not err in granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment. There was no evidence that the attendant circumstance exception to the open-and-obvious doctrine applied in this case.

Judges: Jamison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.