Kracl v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the exclusion where it used “under this policy” language to reduce any ambiguity and where another exclusion defined an insured automobile as one described “in the policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).