KPOJ, Inc. v. Thornton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• notice and comment not required where agency had never before set out an interpretation of the underlying regulation actually at odds with the challenged interpretation
• “As the United States Supreme Court has noted, APA rulemaking is required if an interpretation ‘adopt[s] a new position inconsistent with ... existing regulations.’”
• same, where dispute concerned letter ruling to which circuit court petitioner was not party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).