Skip to main content
· 1/23/1989

Kozman v. Herzig (In Re Herzig)

Citations

  • 96 B.R. 264
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 314
  • 1989 WL 18277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that decision to reopen “will not be set aside absent an abuse of discretion.”
  • holding that decision to reopen “will not be set aside absent an abuse of discretion.”
  • bankruptcy court's refusal to reopen a closed case under 11 U.S.C. § 350(b) reviewed for an abuse of discretion
  • decision on motion to reopen reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Mooreman, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.